Historical Revisionism

The Belmont Club tells us about the implications of airbrushing out cigerettes from photographs of Jean Paul Sarte. Read the whole thing, and check out the links, too.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Canadian Map

Canadian Provinces I’ve visited (and one I lived in)

create your own personalized map of Canada
or check out ourVancouver travel guide

Posted in Uncategorized | 8 Responses

The Map

States I can remember visiting or living in.

create your own personalized map of the USA
or check out ourCalifornia travel guide

Picked up over at The Tulip Girl, again.

November 05, updated to reflect our drive to D.C. last May and I remembered another childhood vacation.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Quality of Life, Quality of Mercy

In a previous post I told about a conversation I had with a friend who claimed that God never gives us pain.

That same friend told me that if I just had enough faith our daughter Cherub would be ‘healed,’ and thus, more glorifying to God. The Cherub’s primary diagnosis is retardation. So what my friend was saying was basically that were the Cherub smarter, God would be more glorified by her existance than He is now. Now, I could be convinced that if my friend were smarter (or wiser?), she’d be bringing more glory to God than she is now, but I’m not convinced that Cherub is a total loss in the God glorifying department.

Why isn’t she, in her happiness and laughter and mischief and unique self, good enough to glorify God in my friend’s eyes, or valuable enough to live in the eyes of many pro-choice types? Are our other ‘normal’ children more pleasing to God, more acceptable somehow? Are their lives worth living, and The Cherub’s is not?

My friend admitted that she was, in fact, assuming that God somehow placed a higher value on a certain level of intelligence or mental developmental level, to use a convoluted phrase.

I’ve given up long ago on using “PC” words about this. The Cherub is brain damaged, mentally retarded, developmentally delayed, handicapped, handicapable, mentally challenged, special needs- I use the words I think communicate best in any given situation. They are all just words, words to describe one aspect of who my daughter is. They each have their uses and functions and I take no offense at any of them, and The Cherub cares even less what words are used, as long as somebody gives her a smile, a hug, or a cookie. However, sometimes certain words are used with the intent to devalue The Cherub and her life.

Some people who have just met us will often tell us over and over again how sorry
they feel for the Cherub. It tends to be the most unobservant, or perhaps self-absorbed, people who feel so sorry for her. We can tell, because sooner or later, they will draw attention to their self-absorbtion by saying something like “I wouldn’t want to live like that.” I find this sadly amusing, as the Cherub is generally a pretty happy soul, and is perfectly content with things as they are (although there could always be another cookie, another song, another hug, another joy ride on a golf cart). I’m pretty sure that I would not want to live my life as a self-absorbed fool, either, but I don’t tell them it would be better if they’d been killed at birth just because I would find it unsatisfying to live life as they do.

To those with a heart and mind to learn, the Cherub has some lessons to teach- just by her existance. It’s hard to stay self-absorbed around somebody who has so little, but loves so much. We tend to feel sorrier for those who do not have a Cherub in their lives.

Christopher Nolan, Irish poet, author, and a remarkable mind is also extremely physically disabled. He wrote a book called _Under the Eye of the Clock_, an autobiographical account of his childhood. We highly recommend this book- it is real. It’s a bit gritty in places, some language, that sort of thing- but this is really a book worth reading.

Mr. Nolan points out that one of the greatest ironies of this age is that now, when technology opens up opportunities and chances for life for the disabled that nobody could have ever even imagined 200 years ago, the ‘opportunity’ many of the able bodied are most anxious to share with the disabled is the chance to kill themselves, or to have the deed done to them under medical supervision. Neither Mr. Nolan nor our Cherub pose a threat to anybody. Neither of them can harm, maim, or kill another human being. So why would some prefer to see people like them aborted, quitely put to sleep, or, as in the case of Terri Shiavo, denied food and hydration?

UPDATED 3/13/05 to correct some typos, most especially the embarrassing one where I said I *would* want to live my life as a self-absorbed fool instead of I would *not*. What a difference is made by those three little letters, eh?

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Response

Exodus 21:22-23

A friend tells me that he believes this verse ought to give pro-life Christians pause. Let us consider it.

Exod 21:22-23
22 If men strive, and hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit
depart from her, and yet no mischief follow: he shall be surely punished,
according as the woman’s husband will lay upon him; and he shall pay as the judges
determine. 23 And if any mischief follow, then thou shalt give life for life,
(KJV)

Exod 21:22-23
22 “And {if} men struggle with each other and strike a woman with
child so that she has a miscarriage, yet there is no {further} injury, he shall
surely be fined as the woman’s husband may demand of him; and he shall
pay as the judges {decide.}
23 “But if there is {any further} injury, then you shall appoint {as a
penalty} life for life,
(New American Standard)

Exod 21:22
22 “If men who are fighting hit a pregnant woman and she gives birth
prematurely but there is no serious injury, the offender must be fined
whatever the woman’s husband demands and the court allows.
23 But if there is serious injury, you are to take life for life,
(New International Version)

Exod 21:22-23
22 “If men fight, and hurt a woman with child, so that she gives birth
prematurely, yet no harm follows, he shall surely be punished accordingly as
the woman’s husband imposes on him; and he shall pay as the judges determine.
23 “But if any harm follows, then you shall give life for life,
(New King James)

the word for ‘fruit’ as used in the KJV is yeled (yeh’-led);
” something born, i.e. a lad or offspring: -boy, child, fruit, son,
young man (one).”

The word for ‘give birth prematurely’ or ‘miscarries’ (as the NAS
translates it) , or ‘depart from her’ is “yatsa’ (yaw-tsaw’);
a primitive root; to go (causatively, bring) out, in a great variety
of applications, literally and figuratively, direct and proxim.:”
It is translated in the KJV as: X after, appear, X assuredly, bear out, X begotten, break out, bring forth (out, up), carry out, come (abroad, out, thereat, without), + be condemned, depart (-ing, -ure), draw forth, in the end, escape, exact, fail, fall
(out), fetch forth (out), get away (forth, hence, out), (able to, cause to,
let) go abroad (forth, on, out), going out, grow, have forth (out),
issue out, lay (lie) out, lead out, pluck out, proceed, pull out, put away,
be risen, X scarce, send with commandment, shoot forth, spread, spring
out, stand out, X still, X surely, take forth (out), at any time, X to [and
fro], utter.
(taken from Strong’s)

I would argue this is not referring to any situation where somebody is deliberately and with malice aforethought attempting to slay the unborn child (as in an abortion). Furthermore, they aren’t even trying to harm the mother- it seems to me to be accidental.

Finally, it’s not at all clear that the baby actually dies. There is one version which translates the word in question as miscarriage, but this word is not used for miscarriage anywhere else that I could find, nor would it make sense to translate it as miscarriage in any other case where it is used. Furthermore, there actually is a word for miscarriage, and it is used in other passages where a miscarriage is
clearly intended (Job, for one example), and which would surely have been used
here if miscarriage were what was intended. The word used instead is
sometimes translated as ‘brought forth’ (as in the creation account, when the ‘earth brought forth grass.’).

It’s used often when somebody goes out of a door or a city, and it’s the
word used when Jacob’s hand comes out of the birth canal ahead of to grab his brother’s heel:

“And after that came his brother out, and his hand took hold on Esau’s heel; and his name was called Jacob: and Isaac [was] threescore years old when she bare them.”Gen. 25:26

 (Updated to clarify, thanks, David)
So it looks to me like what’s happened is a premature birth, not necessarily
a miscarriage, and that the further hurt or mischief referred to is
whether or not the child OR the mother actually dies.

Posted in Uncategorized | 12 Responses


  • The Common Room on Facebook

  • Amazon: Buy our Kindle Books

  • Search Amazon


    Try Audible and Get Two Free Audiobooks

  • Brainy Fridays Recommends: