Dems explain how to rig elections and how they’ve been doing it for fifty years.
I do understand why some of you don’t like O’keefe. I get that. And I also understand that anything that seems like it might help Trump makes many of us vomit a little bit inside our mouths. But truth is truth, and being open minded means looking at both sides, and accepting reality when things are *not* as we wish them to be. So, before dismissing the allegation out of hand, did you watch the videos? Because this is much larger than a mere Trump vs Hillary issue. It started long before this election cycle and it will continue if we keep pretending it’s not real.
But, but O’Keefe! isn’t really a cogent argument. These people are caught on tape saying the things they say, in segments that are clearly not spliced or edited.
And make sense of this for me- If it’s merely all fraud by O’Keefe because ‘edited videos’ (hint, most videos you watch are edited, which is not the same thing as *doctored*), then why did two of the Democrats involved resign almost immediately, and why was one fired for the things he said? That seems like a case for wrongful dismissal at the very least. It’s easy to sue O’Keefe and demand the unedited videos if he has put words in these people’s mouths. That should be provable. But O’Keefe has a pattern of releasing snippets, and then at the end making the full length, unedited footage available, and something tells me these operatives know what they said and know they were caught, not framed.
Furthermore, the latest email releases (podesta emails 12) show further admissions that bird-dogging was a practice Clinton’s campaign is complicit in, you can read it for yourself.
Here’s a quote in an email to Hilary’s campaign outlining plans for strategy (the reply from Hillary’s campaign only says these plans look good, and talks about tightening up some connections in her speeches, no standing firm against bird dogging):
“Engage immigrant rights organizations. DREAMers have been bird dogging Republican presidential candidates on DACA/DAPA, but they’ve learned to respond. There’s an opportunity to bird dog and record questions about Trump’s comments and connect it to the policy.” (never mind what wikileaks revealed about what Clinton’s team did to Bernie and his campaign).
We also have independent confirmation that one of the people who was behind the violent protests in Chicago was at that time on the Clinton payroll. It’s a matter of public record, you can look at the FEC records yourself, they are linked here, and we learn shortly before the Chicago rallies Clinton paid her 1600 dollars and gave her a 30 dollar phone (a burner phone? WHY?)
Creamer visited the White House hundreds of times (it’s also a matter of public record), meeting with Obama almost 50 times:
“Robert Creamer, who acted as a middle man between the Clinton campaign, the Democratic National Committee and “protesters” who tried — and succeeded — to provoke violence at Trump rallies met with President Obama 47 times, according to White House records. Creamer’s last visit was in June 2016.”
Creamer (who has resigned) is married to Illinois liberal senator Jan Schakowsky
We know there is voter fraud and crime all around elections. It’s so conclusive that anybody who claims otherwise immediately loses credibility with me. Here’s George Will pointing out the obvious:
It is hard to think of an innocent reason why Democrats spend so much time, energy and money, scarce resources all, resisting attempts to purge the voter rolls, that is to remove people who are dead or otherwise have left the jurisdiction. It’s hard to think of an innocent reason why they fight so tremendously against Voter I.D. laws. They say, well that burdens the exercise of a fundamental right. The Supreme Court has said that travel is a fundamental right and no one thinks that showing an I.D. at the airport burdens that fundamental right.
We know — we don’t surmise — we know that the 2010, ’12 and ’14 elections were rigged by the most intrusive and potentially punitive institution of the federal government, the IRS. You can read all about it in Kim Strassel’s book Intimidation Game. She’s familiar to all Wall Street Journal readers and FOX viewers. This is not a surmise. I have talked to lawyers in a position to know they say it’s still going on. The IRS is still intolerantly delaying the granting of tax exempt to conservative advocacy groups to skew the persuasion of this campaign.
See also Ace
In 2008, Obama would not even have been on the Indiana primary ballot if not for Democrat operatives forging signatures on his petitions (they also forged signatures on Hillary and Edwards, but only Obama had enough forged sigs to disqualify his place on the ballot). Four Democrat operatives were charged and found guilty (or pleaded guilty). Hardly anybody has ever heard about this, though. I wonder why.