Having a Large Family

 

 

Why having a large family is good for you and cheaper than you think.  This is a fun read sent to me by the eldest child in our own, well, I think of it as a medium sized family, but most people thing of it as large one.  She says it’s all good reading, but this tickled her:

“…having struggled to have a second child, it was hard to shake the mindset that a pregnancy was anything other than a blessing. As our family expanded, necessitating bigger cars and fewer holidays, we took to heart the views attributed to Elizabeth Longford, the historian and Roman Catholic mother-of-eight. Asked why so many, she said that since her children were so different, curiosity drove her to find the limits of genetic diversity.”

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

5 Comments

  1. HeatherHH
    Posted August 28, 2013 at 1:36 pm | Permalink

    Like you, we currently have seven children. I tend to view us as a large family. Some of that is probably influenced by the fact that when I was growing up, I knew no families with more than 4 children, and even those were rare. One person that I know personally just had her 8th child, but I don’t know anyone else personally that has more than the seven we do. When we had six children, I did consider us medium-sized, which would make most people think I’m nuts. I’ve learned most people around here at least would consider 3-4 a large family.

    • Headmistress, zookeeper
      Posted August 28, 2013 at 8:41 pm | Permalink

      I was mainly just teasing about not being a large family with seven. I know what it looks like to others. These days, we’re just a family of five cildren, and with two of them off with their jobs, school, and acts of service, most days there are only 3 kids at home. That’s so tiny.

  2. Posted August 28, 2013 at 8:14 pm | Permalink

    I know these kinds of articles aren’t written for someone like me. We struggled to get pregnant once, then again to get pregnant a second time and then lost that baby early on. If I had had my way from the start, we would have 3 or 4 children and I’d be pregnant again. But now, on hindsight, that means we might not have the son we do have, and I wouldn’t trade him.

    We still hope to grow our family — just via adoption, not birth.

    • Headmistress, zookeeper
      Posted August 28, 2013 at 8:40 pm | Permalink

      You’re right, this article isn’t for people like you and your sweet family. I mainly shared it because parts of it were amusing, and because I get tired of the criticism and false assumptions that are often aimed at larger families, as well as the false assumptions about the costs.

      Our family also grew through adoption- two of the seven are adopted.=)

  3. Posted August 29, 2013 at 4:52 am | Permalink

    Note to self: Don’t read the comments. Don’t. read. the. comments.

    (the article was great however! as were the related links.)

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>